Friday, August 7, 2009
Friday Night Savoir Faire
Gee, since it is Friday and I am not doing anything special tonight after our sojourn in Montreal last weekend, I was thinking mmm where would I be going for drinks tonight if I was back in Sydney? The Establishment of course! Alas I am not back in Sydney, so I will have a gin on my balcony overlooking the carpark instead.
Sacre Faire!
What can you say of a ballet that was first performed in 1913 that caused a riot at its first performance? Savoir Faire! Le Sacre du Printemps choreographed by Nijinsky with music by Stravinsky, under the eye of impresario Diaghilev did just that! This was such a departure from previous works by the Ballet Russe. There was such a scandal at its premiere in Paris, that there was threat that the ballet would not finish.. The music's innovative complex rhythmic structures, timbres, and use of dissonance have made it a seminal 20th century composition. The scandal of a riot at its 1913 premiere made it one of the most internationally well-known and controversial works in performance history.
The complex music and violent dance steps depicting fertility rites first drew catcalls and whistles from the crowd. There were loud arguments in the audience between supporters and opponents of the work. These were soon followed by shouts and fistfights in the aisles. Chaos reigned for the remainder of the performance, and Stravinsky himself was so upset on account of its reception that he fled the theater in mid-scene, reportedly crying. Nijinsky had to stand on a chair shouting counts to the dancers who were unable to hear the orchestra.
The intensely rhythmic score and primitive scenario—a setting of scenes from pagan Russia—shocked audiences more accustomed to the demure conventions of classical ballet. Vaslav Nijinsky's choreography was a radical departure from classical ballet, with jerking angular movements left the audience bewildered and angry. The costumes were unflattering and the makeup was harsh. The most brilliant male dancer (possibly ever), Nijinsky could almost be called the father of modern dance, for this and other works he had choreographed.
Luckily the riots and the controversy that it caused, ensured that the work would continue to be performed. Most of the original choreography has been reconstructed and reinterpreted, however the elements of the original are still there.
Set designs by Nicholas Roerich are below.
The complex music and violent dance steps depicting fertility rites first drew catcalls and whistles from the crowd. There were loud arguments in the audience between supporters and opponents of the work. These were soon followed by shouts and fistfights in the aisles. Chaos reigned for the remainder of the performance, and Stravinsky himself was so upset on account of its reception that he fled the theater in mid-scene, reportedly crying. Nijinsky had to stand on a chair shouting counts to the dancers who were unable to hear the orchestra.
The intensely rhythmic score and primitive scenario—a setting of scenes from pagan Russia—shocked audiences more accustomed to the demure conventions of classical ballet. Vaslav Nijinsky's choreography was a radical departure from classical ballet, with jerking angular movements left the audience bewildered and angry. The costumes were unflattering and the makeup was harsh. The most brilliant male dancer (possibly ever), Nijinsky could almost be called the father of modern dance, for this and other works he had choreographed.
Luckily the riots and the controversy that it caused, ensured that the work would continue to be performed. Most of the original choreography has been reconstructed and reinterpreted, however the elements of the original are still there.Set designs by Nicholas Roerich are below.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
